The “woman issue” in India

On January 26, 1950, the single most important document in the history of independent India came into force: its constitution. Over the last six decades the constitution of India has been called many things: an experiment, a miracle, an aberration, a cornerstone and even an embarrassment.

Interestingly these were much the same things that the Republic of India itself was called in its foundational years – a well-meaning experiment in self-determination that was bound to fail.

It has become a hobby of late for historians of the Indian republic to pick on those original sceptics and jeer at them. But in those initial years of freedom – a period of great trysts with destiny, audacity, venality and cruelty – these doubts in the Indian republic were not without merit.

There just seemed to be too many obstacles in India’s path to respectable nationhood. India was born to throbbing rancour within and without. In Pakistan it had an instant arch-nemesis. Within its borders it was divided into hundreds of pieces both politically – in the form of the princely states and provinces – and socially, thanks to a multitude of languages, religions, castes and other partitions of varying porosity.

Each time this young nation was faced with a crisis these original doubts resurfaced. Anything from a war with China to Nehru’s failing health in the 60s was pointed out as signs of the republic’s impending collapse.

Yet it has survived and, indeed, survived well. Much of the credit for this survival and institutional tenacity is owed to the Indian constitution and to the founding fathers and mothers who drafted this document.

indipence of India

Role of women in the Constitution draft

What role did Indian women play in the drafting of this document? Did they play any role at all? And if they did, how has it made the republic better or worse for women?

These questions summon particular gravity given the ongoing debate on the state of women in India. To be fair there has never been a period when disappointing news about Indian women have not been forthcoming. Female foeticide, misogyny, rape, violence against women, dowry and maternal healthcare have always been problems.

But a rash of brutal sexual assaults in India’s biggest cities have unleashed uncommonly sustained outrage. There is talk of tougher punishment, better policing and even new legislation. In this climate it is worth looking back at the role of Indian women during the foundational period of modern India’s history. Their role was considerable.

The body that debated and drafted India’s constitution was called the Constituent Assembly. It met for the very first time on December 9, 1946. According to the records of the parliament of India, on this opening day 207 members presented the credentials and signed a register. Only 9 of these were women.

Over the next several months the strength of the Assembly would fluctuate as more members joined and left it (many left to move across the border and join Pakistan’s own constituent assembly). Ultimately the Assembly would have a membership of 299 members of whom 15 were women.

It is impossible to overstate the diversity of the backgrounds of these women.

2013109145518771580_20

There were names like Vijayalakshmi Pandit, Sarojini Naidu and Sucheta Kripalani who had all been vigorous members of India’s freedom struggle movement and were very known all over the country.

Begum Aizaz Rasul

Then there were members like Ammu Swaminathan, Begum Aizaz Rasul and Dakshayani Velayudhan who were less known then and even lesser so today.

Rajkumari Amrit Kaur

Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, the member for “Central Provinces and Berar/General”, was an aristocrat belonging to the royal house of Kapurthala in Punjab. A graduate of the Sherborne School for Girls in Dorset and then Oxford University, Kaur would go on to become an ardent Gandhian before independence and a formidable politician and diplomat afterwards.

Dakshayani Velayudhan, by contrast, was born to a poor school teacher and coconut farmer of the low Pulaya caste in Kerala.

Pulaya caste

Many “firsts”

In a memoir published in 2012 Velayudhan’s daugher, Meera Velayudhan wrote this about her mother: “There were many firsts in my mother’s life – the first girl to wear an upper cloth, the first dalit woman graduate in India, a science graduate, a member of the Cochin Legislative Council and of the Constituent Assembly. Many assertions were also made, of not walking with shoulders bent neither making way for the upper castes when walking on the road.” (At the time lower caste women in many places in Kerala were forbidden to cover their breasts.)

Thus even though the contingent of women in India’s Constituent Assembly were very small, they represented extremes of female Indian reality across geographic and social spectra. They also made their presence felt.

The constituent assembly took two years, eleven months and seventeen days to draft India’s constitution. It held eleven sessions, comprising 165 days, on debates and discussion. The transcripts of these debates and discussions form an integral part of India’s “creation myth”. They deserve to be known and read widely. They are not. And if any of the discussions are quoted they are usually the ones pertaining to speeches made by the titans of India’s constitution story: Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhai Patel and above all, B R Ambedkar.

B R Ambedkar

Substantial contributions were made by the women in the assembly too. These range from the hot-topic of whether the assembly should meet on Sundays – thereby depriving Christian members from the chance to attend church services – to the much more substantial debate over whether the parliament should have seats reserved for women.

For instance this is Renuka Ray speaking on August 30, 1947 on the topic of religious education in public funded schools: “Surely denominational schools cannot be run by a democratic secular state. Such schools may be recognized or even aided, but as the State, we envisage under the new Constitution, will be secular having no State religion as such, it cannot set up denomination institutions as State schools… I do not say that denominational religious education should not be allowed. But education given by the State should have the teaching of moral and spiritual values…”

Harijans

And this is Velayudhan opposing separate electoral reservations for untouchables on August 28, 1947: “Even if the Harijans are given this percentage of votes, and this kind of electorate system, the Harijans are not in a position to withstand the attractions that they will have to face at the time of the elections. So many parties can set up candidates and then can purchase the Harijans and put up any candidate they desire…”

Opposing women’s reservation

It is evident from these excerpts that the female members of the constituent assembly in no way limited their inputs to matters of gender. Yet nowhere is their participation more counter-intuitive than in the matter of electoral reservations for women.

Over the last decade or so there has been a move in the Indian parliament to pass reform that would reserve a certain percentage of seats in central and state legislatures for women. Such a reservation already exists in local government bodies, and there has been a plan to extend this to the real bodies of federal and state powers as well. However the opposition to this has been considerable and the bill currently resides in a sort of legislative purgatory where many Indian reforms throng.

But six decades ago most of the women on the constituent assembly vehemently spoke against such a reservation for women. They desired nothing more or less than complete political equality with men.

This despite the fact that they had inherited an imperially imposed electoral system with women’s reservations. A system that had enabled many of them to find places on the constituent assembly in the first place.

Renuka Ray

Yet women members such as Renuka Ray felt that reservations would merely help to shackle down women instead of empowering them. On July 18, 1947, Ray spoke thus against reservations for women: “In the legislatures of India, we have some women, but there are few women who have come from general constituencies… When there is reservation of seats for women, the question of their consideration for general seats, however competent they may be, does not usually arise. We feel that women will get more chances in the future to come forward and work in the free India, if the consideration of ability alone.”

Why then, six decades later, is India once again thinking of reserving seats for women? The answer to that question also helps answer a much broader question: has today’s India lived up to aspirations and hopes of the founding mothers who helped write its constitution?

India’s constitution was an ambitious document written by ambitious men and women. Men and women who were fully aware of the weight of history on their shoulders and the awesome responsibility this new freedom entailed. In their exuberance they set goals for this nation that it has since achieved with mixed success. By any metric India is a richer, healthier, better informed nation today with much greater self-respect than it had six decades ago.

Yet, as the recent reports of rape, violence and gender-based discrimination tell us, India continues to be a country with problems to solve when it comes to women’s issues. Women are undoubtedly better off than they were in 1947. Yet we are still far away from achieving the dreams that our founding mothers set us.

Hansa Mehta

On December 19, 1946, constituent assembly member Hansa Mehta said: “What we have asked for is social justice, economic justice, and political justice. We have asked for that equality which can alone be the basis of mutual respect and understanding and without which real cooperation is not possible between man and woman. Women form one half of the population of this country and, therefore, men cannot go very far without the cooperation of women. This ancient land cannot attain its rightful place, its honoured place in this world without the co-operaton of women.”

It is a call to arms that is just as relevant to India today as it was all those years ago.

The Patriarchy issue

On the day that death penalty was sentenced to the four men who raped and murdered a student in Delhi in December 2012, a Bollywood movie was released, whose poster had its leading ladies with their descending necklines holding a sausage, a banana, and an uncorked champagne bottle.

Grand Masti

So far, the movie, “Grand Masti”, has already crossed the Rs 1 billion mark. Equally absurd is a new rape statistic: that the span of time for a rape to be reported has gone down to 1 rape every 22 minutes than the previous 20 minutes.

Does the shift of two minutes imply more liberated and safe women, and thereby women having control over personal and public space, and thus, her movements? Half of the country’s population has to strife each day to claim the basic thing that she is too a human being.

But women aren’t exactly half the population of India. For every 1,000 boys under the age of six, there are only 914 girls. Girls are either killed in the womb, or the newborn is gagged, asphyxiated or poisoned. Often, it is the mother, still raw from her delivery, who has to eliminate every trace of a daughter.

Here is where women are objectified on the big screen (and they don’t seem to mind those roles); here is where women are constantly reminded of the powerlessness that is their gender, in subtle or pounding thuds.

Often, this rebuttal of one’s ownership of identity come from the women themselves: patriarchy digs its unsettling burrows deep.

The restrictions of going out, to begin with, are based on the premise that “out” is threatening. So the home is seen as the safe haven; it is also the primary school for patriarchy. “Women are given the crown of being the ‘ruler’ at home, which has a very functional basis,” says filmmaker Rahul Roy, who has initiated a project titled “Let’s Talk Men” to include the experiences of men in the broad conversations of gender.

But women do step out – they might wear the veil but they step out to go to the market. In slums, women step out to claim the daily water at a public tap, at 4am. Shalini Nagar, a 55-year-old mother of four, and grandmother of two, says she does not feel empowered because her husband wouldn’t let her step outside the house.

Yet, she is the one taking her ailing daughter-in-law to the hospital. Malls – the new symbol of a globalised India – are the new sites where girls hang out in groups. Slowly, the ceiling is being pushed upwards. In the last two decades, more women are forced to go to work. They are becoming primary breadwinners, and men fear losing the decision-making powers at home.

But is every woman comfortable “outside”? The number of coaches in the suburban railway system in Mumbai, meant to be safe passageways for the city’s women, have been increased from two to three; the first class ladies coaches have gone from one to two.

Woman coach

Yet, as filmmaker Paromita Vohra puts it, “These coaches have failed to integrate women into a wider space. The men’s coaches are still seen as unsafe spaces.” Vohra explored the complexity of space, gender, class and caste when she turned her camera to public toilets in India. “The municipal laws state that the number of toilets for women vis-a-vis men should be in the ratio 2:3. “There is already a lower expectation that is based on an assumption of fewer number of women walking in the streets,” she says.

The assumption of fewer women out there translates into an assumption of their incompetence. Female photographers are continuously undermined by male photographers. Women drivers are assumed to be traffic disasters. Women who have reached the boardrooms have to subtly, swiftly, retort back when assumptions of her lack of business acumen begin to buzz.

But gender roles are changing, possibly making space for women. In the corporate world, more men are going home on Friday nights, like their female colleagues, to spend time with their family, rather than networking at a party. But are institutions in the public sphere open to accommodating these changing gender roles?

A case in point is the delivery of courier packages, and the expectation of someone at home to fetch the package. “Men and women are both working today. But there is an inherent assumption that someone – mostly women – will be at home to receive the packages,” observes Vohra.

In this complex web of women stepping out to chase a little dream, or to bring the daily bread and the occasional pizza home; of women bargaining for the best price of vegetables from their doorsteps; of women leading the boardroom bids; of stay-at-home women entrepreneurs who cook food for scores of office-goers (which is ferried to the destination by the dabbawallah)… there is a slow simmering of thousands of mutinies.

The public space has a long way to go to make it conducive for everyone – men, women, the disabled. But Roy sums up best: “Change is unstoppable, and it is evident everywhere, in small ways. Patriarchy is a losing battle today.”

The precious sources for this article: How far have Indian women come?

Patriarchy: A losing battle in India?

10 Risposte a “The “woman issue” in India”

  1. Its not my first-time to visit see this website, i am browsing this webpage dailly and take pleasant facts from here everyday.

  2. I’m amazed, I actually have to admit. Rarely do I come across a
    blog that’s equally educative and entertaining,
    and undeniably, you’ve hit the nail around the head. The problem is an issue that too few individuals
    are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m happy I found this during my seek out
    something regarding this.

  3. Hey There. I stumbled upon your blog the usage of msn. This
    can be a very neatly written article. I am
    going to be certain to bookmark it and keep coming back to read
    extra of your respective helpful info. Thanks
    a lot for that post. I am going to definitely return.

  4. This website certainly has all the information and facts I needed
    concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

I commenti sono chiusi.